PSYC 1100 sec 050 & 080, Fall 2023: EXAM 3 STUDY GUIDE

EXAM 3:
sec 050 (3:35 class) TUESDAY 12/12/23, 1:00
sec 080 (4:40 class) MONDAY 12/11/23, 1:00

IN MCHU 102


BRING:
* LAPTOP (BORROW FROM BABBIDGE TECH SERVICES DESK IF NEEDED), FULLY CHARGED WITH LOCKDOWN BROWSER INSTALLED AND WORKING (SEE LOCKDOWN BROWSER INFO UNDER "ONLINE EXAMS" ON HUSKYCT)
* PHONE FOR DUO 2FA APP
* PEN OR PENCIL FOR REQUIRED SCRATCH SHEET I'LL PASS OUT
* ID FOR PROCTORS TO CHECK WHEN YOU'RE DONE


REVIEW SESSION: FRIDAY 12/8/23 2:30-3:30 PM, MCHU 102; bring questions to have answered, etc.; come for all or part, leave when feeling smart enough

EXAM 3 will be IN-PERSON IN CLASS, online on HuskyCT using LockDown Browser, which you MUST download, install, and use as your browser instead of Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or any other browser. The download link is here:
DOWNLOAD RESPONDUS LOCKDOWN BROWSER
LockDown Browser works with Windows and Mac computers. It works with iPad tablets and supposedly with Chromebooks, but not on phones. To use LockDown Browser with an iPad you must get the free app from the Apple App store -- see details here:
USING LOCKDOWN BROWSER WITH AN iPAD
You should use a computer if you have one available, if only because I'm less familiar with troubleshooting on an iPad if problems arise.

The third exam will cover material mainly since the second exam (Lectures 21-27), starting with the topic of Human Memory -- but Human Memory was actually begun in Lecture 21 (the recorded lecture, still available) before the second exam, so that material is also part of what's covered on the third exam. The Biology unit (Neuropsychology) and Behavior unit (Learning and conditioning) are NOT covered on the exam; the entire Mind unit (Memory and Sensation and Perception) is.

THE THIRD EXAM IS NOT CUMULATIVE, with the exception that memory material in Lecture 21, immediately before the second exam, is covered on the third exam as well.

The third exam will have 30 multiple choice questions drawn from lecture material and will be do-able in one hour (or less). Don't expect the multiple choice format to mean you'll just be looking through a list of alternatives trying to recognize some familiar information. The emphasis throughout will not be merely on rote memory for facts and definitions, but rather on conceptual understanding of the material. For example, unfamiliar questions related to the lecture content may be included, requiring an application of the knowledge you have gained so far. But not in a scary way. You will benefit from studying as if this were partly an essay exam, even though there will be only multiple choice questions on it!

Lecture vs. text:
IMPORTANT: By "text" I mean the pdf excerpts linked under "COURSE INFORMATION" on the HuskyCT left menu (as well as below), NOT "OpenStax Psychology, 2nd edition" as listed on the syllabus. DO NOT STUDY FROM THE "OPENSTAX" ONLINE TEXTBOOK -- it's not connected to our class material like the pdf readings are.

The lecture material is primary; use the text as a resource to support and elaborate the lecture topics.

If something is covered in lecture, you will be responsible for the lecture coverage and the text coverage of that topic, unless I specifically tell you to omit certain pages (see below).

If something is NOT covered in lecture, you will NOT be responsible for the text coverage of that topic, unless I specifically tell you to study certain pages (see below).

Page numbers for all readings are listed on HuskyCT under the left menu link "COURSE INFORMATION", as well as on this study guide (see below).

The pdf readings are not just a really long story that you read straight through repeatedly. You should read all the assigned material, probably at least twice. But then also search through it to find answers to particular questions that come up in your notes and your reading. When included, use the summary points at the end of the chapters, and the contents at the beginning of chapters, to help you identify what's there and how it's organized.



What to study:

Start with your notes, the slides linked below (and under HuskyCT "COURSE MATERIALS"), and the pdf readings linked below (and under HuskyCT "COURSE INFORMATION"), and then here are my comments:

Human Memory slides are at this link: https://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/memory slides post.pdf. The last slide for this exam is slide 25 on the Loftus and Palmer memory reconstruction experiment. However, slides 26-27 (pdf pp. 13-14) are related to generic memory and may be helpful in reference to the example of semantic priming of the word "doctor" by the word "nurse" (also discussed in pdf reading Ch. 9 pp. 346-348). Only use those last two slides if they're helpful; don't consider them essential to understand on their own.

Sensation and Perception slides are at this link: https://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/sensationperception%20slides%20post.pdf. The last slide for this exam is slide 55 (pdf p. 28), which is the last of several illustrations of Gestalt Psychology concepts. However, slides 56-58 (pdf pp. 28-29), though not used in lecture, may be helpful summaries of the empiricist and nativist positions discussed in lecture, and so are included in case they're useful. Slides 59-62 are about Psychophysics, a topic included in the optional pdf textbook reading but NOT covered at all in lecture, and so they will NOT be covered at all on the exam; they do not appear in the lecture so you are not responsible for them, or the corresponding textbook reading.

The flow of information in memory -- textbook diagram modified to reflect details from lecture by identifying two kinds of rehearsal, and retrieval from LTM, is at this link: http://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/flow%20of%20information%20in%20memory.jpg

The Opponent Process Theory of Color Vision is illustrated with a slightly more informative caption than in the pdf readings at this link: https://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/opponent process.jpg

Links mentioned in the final lecture on Perception:
Roger Shepard's monster illusion: with a movable monster to show the overlap. Unconscious inferences seem to be based on premises about convergence of lines and relative retinal image size, and their implications for object size.
The Ames Room Illusion, and its explanation.

PDF readings:
Here are three pdf files of pages excerpted from my old textbook, which is no longer in print or available for sale. However, since I did use it for years along with my lectures, these pages are MUCH MORE USEFUL TO READ than the OpenStax textbook, if you want to read them to study for the exam! DO NOT STUDY FROM THE OPENSTAX TEXTBOOK.
Here is what best corresponds to what I cover in the lectures, though there is lecture material that's not covered here. Remember, these pages refer to these pdf links, NOT to the OpenStax optional textbook for the course!

MEMORY
CHAPTER 8 PDF: Ch. 8 pp. 301-339 (note fig. 8.20 on p 327 illustrates slightly different divisions of memory than I do -- so use mine!)
CHAPTER 9 PDF: Ch. 9 pp. 346-348 on Generic and Semantic Memory -- the section on "propositions"; note that this is about network models of generic/semantic memory as in the last sentence of that section which refers to "the arrangement of our knowledge within long-term memory": the focus is on spreading activation and priming as in the nurse-doctor example on p. 347)

SENSORY PROCESSES
CHAPTER 4 PDF: Ch. 4 pp. 134-139, 142-144, 160-179; note figures 4.24 A&B on the eye; 4.31 on lateral inhibition; 4.32 (& 4.23) on the visible spectrum; 4.34 on cone types; 4.38 on opponent processes in color vision

PERCEPTION
CHAPTER 5 PDF: Ch. 5 pp. 200-203 (Distance Perception: Where Is It?); 204-205 apparent movement ("phi" phenomenon); 184-187 Gestalt psychology, principles of perceptual organization (in section on "perceptual parsing"), "figure and ground"; 197-198 unconscious inference

MEMORY - Brief outline [including memory material that was covered on Exam 2]:
Long-term vs. short-term memory
- duration, capacity, psychological code, neural code, forgetting
- flow of information in memory: maintenance and elaborative rehearsal; primacy and recency effects in the serial position curve
- STM as "working memory"
- depth of processing as determinant of successful encoding in LTM
Kinds of memory
- long-term/short-term; episodic/generic; explicit/implicit; declarative/procedural
- Henry Molaison ("H.M.") - anterograde amnesia for explicit memory, resulting from surgical removal of hippocampus
Retrieval
- encoding specificity principle
- reconstructive processes in memory (Loftus)
Generic memory

SENSATION AND PERCEPTION - Brief overview [see slides for more content]:
We began the study of Sensory Processes with the distinction between Sensation and Perception:
Sensations are about having experiences, like seeing colors or hearing the sound of a voice or musical instrument. We looked at the nature of light and how it affects aspects of our nervous system to produce visual experiences of color, brightness, and related phenomena.
Perceptions are about having knowledge about the objects and events in the world, based on those experiences. The proximal stimulus (the image projected onto the retina) has to tell us something about the distal stimulus (the actual object out in the world in front of us). The retinal image doesn't contain enough information to do that, so it seems we have to supplement it in various ways.
We saw some examples of how we may use certain information or cues in the proximal stimulus to figure out depth or distance in the world, in particular using interposition, linear perspective, and relative size.
We also saw examples of how we may use innate principles of perceptual organization to interpret the raw sensations in an image as forms and objects.
The slides and optional text convey much of this in pictures so you can examine the pictures to understand what they're about.

Names to know since Exam 2 (roughly in order of appearance in this course):
Henry Molaison ("H.M."), Fergus Craik & Endel Tulving, Elizabeth Loftus, Johannes Müller, Thomas Young (trichromatic theory), Hermann von Helmholtz (trichromatic theory, depth perception by unconscious inference)



[not on the exam, but take a break for a minute...]

Forgetfulness
from Questions About Angels (1991)
Billy Collins

The name of the author is the first to go
followed obediently by the title, the plot,
the heartbreaking conclusion, the entire novel
which suddenly becomes one you have never read, never even heard of,

as if, one by one, the memories you used to harbor
decided to retire to the southern hemisphere of the brain,
to a little fishing village where there are no phones.

Long ago you kissed the nine Muses goodbye
and watched the quadratic equation pack its bag,
and even now as you memorize the order of the planets,

something else is slipping away, a state flower perhaps,
the address of an uncle, the capital of Paraguay.

Whatever it is you are struggling to remember
it is not poised on the tip of your tongue,
not even lurking in some obscure corner of your spleen.

It has floated away down a dark mythological river
whose name begins with an L as far as you can recall,
well on your own way to oblivion where you will join those
who have even forgotten how to swim and how to ride a bicycle.

No wonder you rise in the middle of the night
to look up the date of a famous battle in a book on war.
No wonder the moon in the window seems to have drifted
out of a love poem that you used to know by heart.





General recommendations about studying:
I would make two recommendations about studying for all the exams in this class (and possibly in other classes):

1) First, a common experience is for students to have read the textbook, web links, and their notes, and feel quite secure that they understand everything -- but then not see that understanding reflected in their exam scores. Consider why that might be: looking at the material and having a feeling of understanding is a rather passive way to confirm your knowledge. I too can look at the text, web links, and notes, and feel like I understand them all, yet let's be honest, my understanding is probably quite a bit deeper than yours despite the similarity of the feeling. What you should aim for is not just recognition and sensibleness, but real familiarity and comfort, where you feel like you could actually explain the topic clearly to a fellow student who had a question about it, or even to someone who had no knowledge of it (e.g. a parent or roommate). Not that you literally need to deliver practice lectures to an audience, but maybe that's something to try to imagine, to see where your gaps and shortcomings might be.

2) Second, the multiple choice format often leads students to expect a kind of recognition test where terms are matched up with definition a, b, c, or d, or maybe a concept is described as being about a, b, c, or d. But multiple choice questions (mine included) can require you to think hard about comparisons or contrasts between perspectives, or ways that one idea implies or is linked to another, or applications of the topics to particular situations. For this reason, I find flashcards and the like to be of limited use, maybe good for memorizing what "myelin" is for or what the threshold for an action potential is, but flashcards tend to focus on isolated pieces of information rather than how concepts are related to one another. It makes sense, for example, to know not just what "inhibition" means but also what forms it might take (disinhibition, reciprocal inhibition), various ways the concept appears in the nervous system and in behavior, examples, etc. These are all things that are addressed explicitly in class, so I'm not implying that you need to creatively come up with these explanations; just don't assume that a superficial memory of a term and what it means will suffice. Sometimes students ask me if they just need to know the major points of what we covered, and unfortunately the answer is, no, that's not enough: you need to know the details too.

For these two reasons I usually suggest that the way to think about my exams is to pretend you're studying for an essay exam rather than a multiple choice exam. That way you realize you don't only need to know what the concepts mean, but you also have to be able to link them together and understand why and how they're connected. And you want to know this at a level where you'd be able to produce such an explanation in an essay, because even though you don't have to actually write it, that type of preparation will allow you to make the connections that the questions ask you to make. Students have sometimes said they don't think my questions are too difficult, really -- just that they make you think through them to figure them out instead of instantly answering or not answering correctly. That's exactly my intention.